Collaborative Evaluation-Design Template

URL: http://keepingitrealforlibraries.blogspot.com/
Site Name: Keeping It Real: Professional Information Ethics and Libraries
Date Accessed: 11/1/2014
Evaluators: Becky Labonte, Jean Ruark, Bree Stephany, Brooke VanDerlin, Jennifer Webster
	B. Labonte		J. Ruark		B. Stephany		B. VanDerlin		J. Webster
DESIGN EVALUATION CRITERIA
	(5 to 0)		(5 to 0)		(5 to 0)		(5 to 0)		(5 to 0)
OVERALL DESIGN		Yes OR No		Yes OR No		Yes OR No		Yes OR No		Yes OR No
To what extent are there an effective use of contrasting elements that draw one into the page (CARP)?	5		5		5		5		4
To what extent are elements aligned to establish meaningful chunks of information (CARP)?	5		5		5		5		4
To what extent does the site have effective repetition of elements:  e.g., pages, navigation bars, graphics, organization (CARP)?	5		5		5		5		5
To extent does proximity of elements etablish meaningful relationships or non-proximity of elements  to disambiguate possible confusions (CARP)?	5		4		5		4		4
To what extent does the site demonstrate effective layout and composition?	4		4		5		5		5
To what extent does the site use colors well?	5		5		5		5		5
To what extent does the site use textures effectively?	5		4		5		5		5
To what extent is typography well used?	5		4		5		4		4
To what extent are images or graphics used effectively (e.g., images and graphics are appropriate and not overly used)?	5		5		5		5		4
What is your general impression of the design overall?	5		5		5		5		5
Design Subtotal:	49	Yes	46	Yes	50	Yes	48	Yes	45	Yes
INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE GOALS	[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]
How well is the information organized (formatted, grouped, clustered, in tables)?	5		5		5		4		4
How effective are the labels and to what extent is the labeling system defined?	5		4		5		5		4
How efficient and effective is the navigation system?	5		5		5		5		4
How effective is the search system?	4		0		5		4		4
What is your general impression of the level of information architecture overall?	5		5		5		4		5
Information Architecture Goals Subtotal:	24	Yes	19	Yes	25	Yes	22	Yes	21	Yes
USABILITY GOALS	[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]
To what extent is the site effective to use?	5		5		5		5		5
To what extent is the site efficient to use?	5		5		5		5		4
To what extent is the site easy to learn?	5		5		5		5		5
What is your general impression of the level of the achievement of usability goals overall?	5		5		5		5		4
Usability Goals Subtotal:	20	Yes	20	Yes	20	Yes	20	Yes	18	Yes
USER EXPERIENCE GOALS	[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]
How satisfying or affective is the site?	5		5		5		5		4
How motivating is the site (that is, move you to explore the site, fill out a form, request further information, etc.)?	5		3		5		4		5
How informative was the information presented?	5		5		5		5		5
What is your general impression of the achievement of user experience goals overall?	5		4		5		5		5
User Experience Goals Subtotal:	20	Yes	17	Yes	20	Yes	19	Yes	19	Yes
FUNCTIONALITY	[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]
To what extent is the site download speed good?	5		4		5		5		5
To what extent do all the links work?	5		5		5		4		4
How effective was a blog format vs. website?	4		3		5		4		4
What is your general impression of technical functionality overall?	4		4		5		4		4
Functionality Goals Subtotal:	18	Yes	16	Yes	20	Yes	17	Yes	17	Yes
UNIVERSAL ACCESS GOALS	[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]		[5 to 0]
How well does the site accommodate users with disabilities (e.g., visually impaired, motility-impaired, hearing-impaired, etc.).	4		3		4		3		3
To what extent were assistive features incorporated?	4		3		5		3		3
To what extent are universal access goals achieved in this site?	5		4		5		3		3
Universal Access Goals Subtotal:	13	Yes	10	Yes	14	Yes	9	Yes	9	Yes
Score Total from All Criteria	120	Yes	109	Yes	124	Yes	113	Yes	108	Yes
Perfect Score	125		125		125		125		125
Percentage of Perfect Score	96%		87%		99%		90%		86%
Average Percentage of Perfect Score	92%